|
|
Safety and Environmental Management System (SEMS) |
|
The key to the rule is found in the following quotation, "The Workplace Safety Rule covers all offshore oil and gas operations in Federal waters and makes mandatory the currently voluntary practices in the American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice (API RP 75)." Timing
Elements of SEMSThe rule is based on the well-established Safety and Environmental Program (SEMP) as described in API Recommended Practice 75, the first edition of which was published in 1991. The elements of SEMS are listed below.
A brief overview of each of these elements is provided below. Detailed guidance for each of the elements is provided in the book Process Risk and Reliability Management. 1. General ProvisionsSEMP starts with a General section. Background information to do with the management of process risk and safety programs is available from our Management and Process Safety Management pages. 2. Safety and Environmental InformationGuidance to do with the collection and management of technical information is provided at our Process Safety Management page. 3. Hazards AnalysisWith respect to hazards analysis the MMS stated the following in a previous publication: This element would require that a hazards analysis (facility level) be conducted for all facilities. The purpose of the analysis is to identify, evaluate, and where unacceptable, reduce the likelihood and/or minimize the consequences of uncontrolled releases of oil and gas and other safety or environmental incidents. With respect to analysis methods, MMS suggests that operators use API RP 14 C, Recommended Practice for Analysis, Design, Installation, and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems for Offshore Production Platforms, Seventh Edition, March 2001; or API RP 14J, Recommended Practice for Design and Hazards Analysis for Offshore Production Facilities, Second Edition, May 2001, as guides, as well as other accepted documents and practices. In addition, this element would also require that a job hazard analysis (operations/task level) be performed to identify and evaluate hazards of a job/task for the purpose of hazards control or elimination. Further information to do with hazards analysis is available from the following sources:
4. Management of ChangeWith respect to Management of Change the MMS states the following (also in a previous publication): This element would require lessees/operators to document and analyze all proposed facility changes to determine possible adverse safety and environmental impacts, with the exception of replacement in kind. There are a number of specific topics to be covered in this analysis, including changes in: facilities and procedures, personnel, work practices, equipment (including addition of new equipment or modifications to existing equipment), and the safety and environmental implications of these changes. Further information to do with hazards analysis is available from Chapters 3 and 4 of Process Risk and Reliability Management.5. Operating ProceduresWith respect to Operating Procedures the MMS stated the following: This element would require OCS oil and gas operators’ management officials to include requirements for written facility operating procedures designed to enhance efficient, safe, and environmentally sound operations. While operating procedures are reviewed as part of MOC procedures, MMS would also recommend that these procedures be reviewed separately to ensure that they reflect current practices. Further information to do with hazards analysis is available from Chapter 9 of Process Risk and Reliability Management.6. Safe Work PracticesInformation to do with safe work practices is available at our Inherent Safety and Behavior Based Safety pages.7. TrainingThe topic of training includes contractors. Further information to do with training is provided in (Chapter 10) of the book Process Risk and Reliability Management .8. Mechanical IntegrityThe BOEM has stated the following regarding Mechanical Integrity: This element would require that procedures are in place to ensure that equipment is designed, fabricated, installed, tested, inspected, monitored, and maintained in a manner consistent with appropriate service requirements, manufacturer’s recommendations, and industry standards to promote safe and environmentally sound operations in the OCS. Further information to do with mechanical integrity is available from Chapters 6 and 7 of the book Process Risk and Reliability Management. 9. Prestartup ReviewInformation to do with prestartup reviews and operational readiness is provided in the free
ebook
Prestartup Safety Review
and in
Chapter
8 of Process Risk and Reliability Management. One of the reasons that the Deepwater Horizon event was so serious
was that the emergency response was not as effective as it should have
been, resulting in additional fatalities.
Further information to do with emergency response and control is available from
Chapter
11 of Process Risk and Reliability Management.
Information to do with incident investigation and
root cause analysis is provided at our
Incident Investigation and Root Cause Analysis page and in (Chapter
12) of Process Risk and Reliability Management.
Regarding audits, the BOEMRE has previously stated that,
This proposed rule would require lessees and operators to have their SEMS program audited at least once every 3 years by either
an independent third party or by qualified personnel designated within the company. A knowledgeable and experienced auditor would audit the
SEMS program to determine if an OCS lessee and operator is complying with the SEMS plan.
These audits would be conducted in an office environment and/or in the field, and cover both a broad range of activities or be
focused on a particular area (e.g., records, gas compressors, blowout preventers, or documentation) as
appropriate. Auditors must meet the qualifications as proposed in this
rule.
The BOEMRE may approve independent third parties to conduct audits.
Audit protocols written for the SEMP program for four of the elements can be
downloaded here:
The SEMS program must be fully documented - which gives it some of the features of a safety case.
The scope of this element appears to be greater than that required by RP 75.
This is one element which does not have a match in the OSHA PSM standard. |
home | top of page | view cart
Copyright © Sutton Technical Books 2007-2012. All rights reserved
PO Box 2217
Ashland, VA 23005-9998